Sarah Isgur and David French are joined by Amy Howe and David Lat, of The Dispatch’s extended legal universe, to debate whether the Supreme Court should be more transparent.
Sarah and David then separate fact from the fiction in the arrest of Judge Hannah Dugan. (Also: should there be cameras in the Supreme Court?)
The Agenda:
—Cameras at SCOTUS?
—SCOTUS oral argument goes off the rails
—Calling other lawyers the “L” word
—The arrest of Judge Hannah Dugan
—Immunity doctrine is a mess
—Louis Vuitton and criminal contempt
—Old Whig No. 5
—Trump admin and disparate impact
—Harvard Law Review’s DEI
Please note that we at The Dispatch hold ourselves, our work, and our commenters to a higher standard than other places on the internet. We welcome comments that foster genuine debate or discussion—including comments critical of us or our work—but responses that include ad hominem attacks on fellow Dispatch members or are intended to stoke fear and anger may be moderated.
With your membership, you only have the ability to comment on The Morning Dispatch articles. Consider upgrading to join the conversation everywhere.