Skip to content
Andy Smarick /

The Proper Role for Iconoclasts

Important institutions should never be led by those whose primary qualifications are eccentricity and provocation.
Debate-Smarick
Illustration by Noah Hickey/The Dispatch. (Photos by Kevin Dietsch and Steven Ferdman via Getty Images.)
In our polarized era, there are fewer and fewer spaces where people who disagree can do so productively and in good faith. The Dispatch’s Debate Series aims to be an outlier: a regular feature where two writers with opposing views can hash out some of the thorniest political and cultural issues roiling the national conversation. If you have an idea for a future topic, please let us know at debates@thedispatch.com.

Conservatives have a special duty to protect iconoclasts.

At first blush, this idea doesn’t quite square. Conservatism, properly understood, seeks to protect order and tradition. Why should it defend those who challenge the status quo?

There’s a simple answer: Because iconoclasts sometimes raise the right questions.

Andy Smarick is a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute. He writes regularly for his Substack “Governing Right.”

Read the Counterpoint

Loading