Skip to content
Did Pennsylvania Have More Mail-In Ballots Recorded Than Were Requested?
Go to my account

Did Pennsylvania Have More Mail-In Ballots Recorded Than Were Requested?

No.

On Friday, November 27, Doug Mastriano, Republican state senator from Pennsylvania, tweeted a screenshot of what is said to be “Pennsylvania Official votes,”  from “11/24 8pm,” which he claims was “posted on our Department of State dashboard but had since been deleted.” 

The voting information is accompanied with the following caption: “Pennsylvania reports having mailed out 1,823,148 ballots, of which 1,462,302 were returned. Yet total mail-in votes number 2,589,242? From where did the extra 2,589,242-1,462, 302=1,126,940 votes come?”

President Donald Trump retweeted Mastriano’s tweet, claiming the “Pennsylvania votes were rigged.”

Mastriano, however, cites data from the 2020 primary election, not the general election. The insinuation that there were more mail ballots cast than the number of requested mail ballots is false. 

According to Open Data Pennsylvania, there were 1,823,148 mail ballots requested, with 79.97 percent returned in the 2020 primary election.

Per data from the Pennsylvania Secretary of State’s office, there were a total of 3,087,524 mail-in ballot requests, 1,941,131 of which were Democrat and 784,851 of which were Republican, with the rest either having a third party affiliation or none at all. There were a recorded 2,629,672 mail-in ballots returned in total.

If you have a claim you would like to see us fact check, please send us an email at factcheck@thedispatch.com. If you would like to suggest a correction to this piece or any other Dispatch article, please email corrections@thedispatch.com.

Khaya Himmelman is a fact checker for The Dispatch. She is a graduate of Columbia Journalism School and Barnard College.

Share with a friend

Your membership includes the ability to share articles with friends. Share this article with a friend by clicking the button below.

Please note that we at The Dispatch hold ourselves, our work, and our commenters to a higher standard than other places on the internet. We welcome comments that foster genuine debate or discussion—including comments critical of us or our work—but responses that include ad hominem attacks on fellow Dispatch members or are intended to stoke fear and anger may be moderated.

You are currently using a limited time guest pass and do not have access to commenting. Consider subscribing to join the conversation.

With your membership, you only have the ability to comment on The Morning Dispatch articles. Consider upgrading to join the conversation everywhere.